SAFENET


SAFENET

Wildland Fire Safety & Health Reporting Network

SAFENET Event Information
Create Agency Response

SAFENET ID:
20180803-0001        [Corrective Actions]
Event Start Date:
08/02/2018 1700
Event Stop Date:
08/03/2018 1200 
Incident Name:
Saddle Mountain Fire
Fire Number:
L2GV 
State:
Washington
Jurisdiction:
BLM
Local Unit:
Washington BLM
Incident Type:
Wildland
Incident Activity:
Line
Stage of Incident:
Initial Attack
Position Title:
ICT3 
Task:
Initial Attack 
Management Level:
3
Resources Involved:
Engines, Dozer, Overhead, Aircraft 
Contributing Factors
Contributing Factors:
Communications, Human Factors
Human Factors:
Decision Making, Leadership  
Other Factors:
 
Narrative
Describe in detail what happened including the concern or potential issue, the environment (weather, terrain, fire behavior, etc), and the resulting health issue.
We responded to the Saddle Mountain fire as an ICT3 and ICT3 Trainee. When we arrived at the incident on August 2, 2018 at approximately 1707, we proceeded to attempt to contact the “Saddle IC”. No contact was made by radio, and we were unable to find an identified federal agency IC on the ground. One federal engine on scene was contacted, and responded that the county was in command, but no federal IC was established. We discussed the IC role with resources on the fire, and they directed us to a local county fire chief. He seemed to be the one in charge of most of the resources, so we proceeded to establish a unified command between him, myself (ICT3) and the ICT3-t. No federal resources seemed to have made any effort to establish themselves as an IC at that point. This was all during an operationally complex incident that included 2 fire boss aircraft, a helicopter, air attack, 4-6 federal engines and 8-12 county apparatus. Once we established a command structure, we were able to assign, communicate with, and account for all resources on the incident.
Immediate Action Taken
Reporting Individual : please describe actions you took to correct or mitigate the unsafe/unhealthful event.
Once it was determined that the incident did not have a clear Incident Commander or leadership structure in place, we immediately established a unified command with the local county fire chief. Our ICT3 team established divisions, assigned division supervisors, relayed a communication plan, and accounted for all resources on the fire. An action plan and tactical assignments were also communicated to all resources on the fire.

After the incident, incident and unit level leadership discussed the complexities of responding to incidents under federal jurisdiction that involve many different cooperators. The importance of establishing a federal agency incident commander, or at a minimum a chief of party or point of contact, was discussed as an essential step to safely managing such complex incidents on federal lands.


Agency Response

20180803-0001-CA001

Return to Top